Shalam Israel, We are the original Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge, out of 1 West 125th St. Harlem, NYC, since 1969. The HOME OF THE TRUTH! In the Spirit of the Most High, in the name of Christ under Commanding General Yahanna, we have dedicated and hazarded our lives to bringing the 12 Tribes of the nation of Israel back to the Father in spirit and truth. The people of Negro, and Indian descent, scattered throughout North, South, Central America and the West Indian Islands are the Lost 12 Tribes of Israel. Wherever we are; in the ghettos, the barrios, the reservations or shanty towns; on the web, and in our everyday lives we strive to wake up our people.
Last month, on May 24th, 2013 on behalf of Liberty Place Inc, a civil suit was filed in Philadelphia circuit court against the Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge. In the suite, it was purported that the ISUPK was trespassing on Liberty Place private property with it's weekly "street speakings" on the corner of 16th and Chestnut st. in downtown Philadelphia. While Liberty Place wanted the Street speakings to be banned altogether, the judge put in place a temporary injunction, which required the ISUPK to get city permits to use a sound amplifier, and set up a podium.
Within a week, the requirements of the injunction were met, and the men of the ISUPK were back on 16th and Chestnut in full effect. Dissatisfied with how quickly the ISUPK were back on the street, Liberty Place filed yet again another civil suit, this time addressing the manner of speech, and the content of the ISUPK street speakings. Hiring the largest law firm in the city of Philadelphia, Biddle & Drinker, Liberty Place sought to squash out the truth of the Most High and Christ.
Two months later, on July 19, 2013, after several days of trial, countless hours of depositions, testimony, cross-examination, and over $10,000 in lawyer fees, circuit court judge Ellen Ceisler ruled in favor of the ISUPK. The judge declared that not only were the weekly “religious demonstrations” protected under the first amendment of the US Constitution, but also that “peaceful protests conducted in a peaceful and legal manner are lawful, regardless of their impact on a business.”
Proverbs 16:7 - When a man's ways please the Lord , he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
In order to please the Most High, a man must keep the laws, statutes, and commandments. When a man's ways please the Most High, the Most High will even make his enemies to be at peace with him.
After this monumental victory in court, it should be evident to everyone that the ways of the men of the ISUPK please the Most High. As far as our right to speak on the street is concerned, the so called white man, who is the devil that the Bible speaks of, has been made to be at peace with the ISUPK. However it wasn't magic, or divine intervention which caused the men of the Most High and Christ to prevail.
The ways of the ISUPK which please the Most High, and cause our enemies to be at peace with us, are also the ways which deter weak minded men, from giving their life to serving the Most High and Christ in this truth. The favor that the Most High has bestowed upon us, is the result of many years of hard work, strict discipline, constant training, meticulous attention to detail, and taking orders. The same rank system which the Most High established for Israel, through Moses and again with Christ, is what made our defense against this attack from the devil impenetrable.
Romans 13:3 - For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: [4] For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
The white man who is ruling on the earth is not a terror to those doing what's right, but a terror to those doing evil. If you are afraid of their power, then do that which is good, and you will be praised for the good you do. Those with power are servants of the Most High for the good, but if you will do evil then be afraid, for his weapons aren't for show. If you do evil, they embody the spirits of vengeance of the Most High, to revenge him and execute his wrath upon you.
The so called white man is not a problem for the Home of the Truth, and the men of the Most High and Christ. The men of the ISUPK are obedient, disciplined, and we not only keep the laws of the Most High, but we keep Americas laws as well. Since 1969 we have been out on the streets teaching, prophesying, raising up the 12 tribes of Israel, and we have harmed no one. The Most High made our reputation as militant, disciplined, biblical scholars recieve praise in the white man's court of law.
The righteousness of the men of the ISUPK, ensured that the judge protected our rights as citizens in this country. If it weren't for our righteousness then the Most High would have had the white man throw us in jail for the truth that we speak on the corner of 16th and Chestnut. We have, and will continue to exercise our right to speak freely and peaceably assemble. The Most High will not allow the Devil to take that away from us.
Hebrews 4:12 - For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the hearted.
The Bible is the greatest weapon in the earth. The laws, statutes, commandments, and prophecies from the Most High are powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword. The Most High knows the thoughts, and intentions of both the righteous and the wicked. It is his word that cuts through the flesh, and bone to the soul and spirit of them both.
During the trial, excerpts from ISUPK street speakings were played in the courtroom. As we stood strong behind the word of the Most High and Christ, the lawyers for Liberty Place tried to make the case that our "hate speech" wasn't protected under the first amendment. After hearing that "the white man is the devil," "God hates white people," "black woman need to stop being whores," and "blacks, Latinos, and Native American Indians are the chosen people of God;" the judge not only ruled that what we were saying was legal, but that everything we had to say was substantive, and purposeful.
Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
No weapon that is formed against the Most High, Christ, and the children of Israel shall prosper; and every tongue that rises against us in judgment, in the spirit of the Most High, we shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the Most High, and our righteousness is of him.
Nothing can stop this truth. This has always been our hope, and by faith we have trusted the Most High to protect us. We are now in the days when the earth is going to be shown who the Most High is protecting. Regardless of how much the the white man, and those of our people that have joined him, hate the word of the Most High, this word will continue to go out. ISUPK will continue to hit any and every street corner that the Most High wills, for our people to be awaken in these last days.
The so called white man is the devil that the Bible speaks of. His mos54t recent attempts to halt the spread of the truth, should be a sign to Israelites, and heathens alike, that the truth being taught on street corners, in metropolitan cities throughout this country, by the men of the ISUPK is a problem to America's status quo.
John 8:32 - And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
The truth of the Most High and Christ, is the only thing that can free so called Blacks, Latinos, and Native American Indians.
The Most High is calling all the children of Israel to hear the truth that has been given to the men of the ISUPK. We are building a righteous government to rule this earth when Christ returns to free us from this sinful kingdom. The time for sinning and disregarding the power of the Most High and Christ is at an end. Join the righteous army of Christ and stand for the Most High Power in the ISUPK.
Every Monday Night, check out the Live Online Radio Broadcast, with Commanding General Yahanna from 9-11pm, at www.ISUPK.com or listen in live on Skype @ 215-586-4851.
Enroll free in our live online classes, Tuesday through Friday from 7-9pm EST, on the website or call in on the same Skype number. Don’t forget to pay your tithes and your freewill offerings.
Visit our online school store. Support the truth by purchasing audio CD’s with 1 hour long teachings, DVD’s with Video Footage from Street Speakings, along with official authentic
Hebrew Israelite garments and accessories to represent your nationality.
Get down with this truth, get down with this body, let us come together, and build this nation up right for the Most High and Christ. We love you Israel, Shalam!!!
Friday
Saturday
Al Sharpton Accused of Helping Lead FBI to Assata Shakur
The Rev. and the
Fugitive Sharpton tried to set up Chesimard, activists say
By Ron Howell, Newsday,
Friday 21 October 1988
The Rev. Al Sharpton,
who has worked as a federal informant, tried to set up a meeting with black
fugitive radical JoAnne Chesimard in 1983, according to activists who said they
were approached by Sharpton.
The black activists said
they feared Sharpton was trying to deliver Chesimard into the arms of federal
agents, but said they had no proof.
One law-enforcement
source, who declined to be identified but has detailed knowledge of Sharpton’s
activities as an FBI informant, said this week that Sharpton was working as an
informant at the time he sought to meet Chesimard. The source said that one of
Sharpton’s assignments was to try to lead agents to Chesimard, who escaped from
prison in 1979 after being convicted in the killing a New Jersey state trooper.
“It wasn’t a big massive
operation. It was just a small shot, an everyday deal,” the source said. “I
would equate it with setting up 10 traps a day trying to catch a fox . . .” He
said Sharpton was not a major participant in the search for the woman, who goes
by the African name Assata Shakur.
A top FBI official said
that Sharpton was not used in any manner to lure Shakur into a trap. “This is
the first I’m hearing of it, it’s bull———,” FBI Assistant Deputy Director
Kenneth Walton, who led the Shakur investigation, said earlier this week.
( Kenneth Walton )
Sharpton flatly denied
trying to make contact with Shakur.
Newsday reported in
January that beginning in 1983 Sharpton secretly supplied federal law
enforcement agencies with information on boxing promoter Don King, reputed
organized crime figures and black leaders and elected officials. And in a two-hour
interview, Sharpton admitted to Newsday that he had assisted the government in
drug and organized crime cases. He said he also accompanied undercover federal
agents wearing body recorders to meetings with various subjects of federal
investigations. He said he had allowed the U.S. attorney’s office for the
Eastern District of New York to install
a tapped telephone in his Brooklyn home.
Sharpton has insisted he
never turned over information on black radicals or on King.
This week, Sharpton
denied assertions by Ahmed Obafemi, a long-time activist, and Kwame Brathwaite,
an activist and photographer who says Sharpton asked him to set up an encounter
with Obafemi. Both men say that Obafemi acted as the intermediary in the failed
discussions with Sharpton to reach Shakur.
Sharpton called the men
“liars” and said they were possibly “police agents.” He charged they are part
of “an element in the black community that has lost out . . . and that will
fabricate any story out of jealousy because they have no following . . . ”
(Ahmed Obafemi (middle))
(Kwame Brathwaite)
Obafemi, the national
organizer for the New Afrikan People’s Organization, said Sharpton met with him
in Manhattan at least four times in 1983, over a period of about two months. He
said that Sharpton offered to donate money to help black revolutionaries running from the law
and that Sharpton was particularly interested in setting up a meeting with
Shakur, once referred to as the “soul” of the Black Liberation Army.
Sharpton told Obafemi he
was representing two former Black Panthers, who wanted to see Shakur, according
to Obafemi.
The ex-Panthers were
supposedly trying to make useful contacts in
case they had to flee the country someday, Obafemi said he was told.
“The first discussion
was that they were close to her, that they had been in the [Black Panther]
party with her and that they wanted to talk to her,” Obafemi said. “I wanted to
find out who they were, but he said they really didn’t want to be known.”
Shakur was once a member
of the Black Panther Party, but went underground around 1971 because she said
she believed the group was being infiltrated by city and federal law
enforcement officers.
The 1983 deal fell
through at a final meeting when Sharpton insisted that money would be donated
only if the two former Panthers could meet Shakur. Failing that, Obafemi said,
Sharpton was interested in making any kind of “contact” with her or with any of
her close associates also on the run from the law. “Naturally, I never got
back” to him, said Obafemi, whose organization believes that blacks should have
their own country within the United States and that they have the right to
fight for it.
“Obviously we had to
feel that a definite possibility existed he was working for the government, and
we would have felt that way about him or anybody else who approached us in that
manner,” said Chokwe Lumumba, an attorney and chairman of the New Afrikan
People’s Organization.
(Chokwe Lumumba)
Lumumba had been
informed in 1983 by Obafemi about Sharpton’s proposal. The attorney said his
organization was more interested in getting information about Sharpton’s
motives than in receiving money from him. “I can’t say that we were able to
make any definite conclusions” about whether Sharpton was acting as an agent
for the government, Lumumba said.
Both Lumumba and Obafemi
denied knowing where Shakur was at the time.
Sharpton’s first
broached his interest in Shakur during a chance encounter with Brathwaite, a
black nationalist, Brathwaite said. Brathwaite said he happened to run into
Sharpton one day in midtown but he could not remember the month. Already
acquainted with each other from entertainment circles, the two men started
talking and Sharpton “said he wanted to make a donation to Assata,” Brathwaite said.
A day or two later,
Brathwaite told Obafemi of the offer. “I told him to watch out,” said
Brathwaite. “I knew that authorities were trying to find out where she [Assata
Shakur] was and that they were trying to get close to somebody who was close to
her . . . And then I just knew that he’s always been a hustler.”
Last year, Newsday
disclosed that Shakur was given political asylum in Cuba and was living there
with her daughter, now 14 years old. She is probably the most sought-after of
the 1970s radicals linked to bank robberies and police killings over a 10-year
span.
The specific amount of
the contribution Sharpton said he was prepared to make in 1983 on behalf of the
ex-Panthers was not discussed, Obafemi said; but Sharpton said the prospective
contributors gained the money by “ripping off the system,” Obafemi recalled.
He said that at least
two of the meetings occurred in a luxurious apartment at 30 Lincoln Plaza, near
Lincoln Center. That was the building where, according to a law enforcement
source and a report published in the Feb. 2, 1988 edition of The Village Voice,
a federal agent using the name Victor Quintana set up an apartment in 1983 or
earlier to lure boxing world denizens suspected of illegal activity. Quintana
in that year ensnared Sharpton into working for the FBI, New York Newsday
reported in January.
The Village Voice
article reported that apartment was on the 29th floor, but Obafemi could not
recall the floor on which he had his rendezvous with Sharpton. Sharpton lives
in Brooklyn and Obafemi said he did not explain why Sharpton had access to the
apartment. “He made me think it was his,” said Obafemi. “I was saying (to
myself), ’What kind of money must they have to have a spot in here.’ He had the
keys and everything.”
Sharpton denied this
week ever being in the building.
Obafemi said that up
until 1983 he knew Sharpton only as the head of a youth organization, the
National Youth Movement, and as someone with vague connections in the
entertainment world.
Obafemi is the
ex-husband of Nehanda Obafemi, once known as Cheri Laverne Dalton, who is still
wanted by the federal government in connection with the notorious Brink’s
robbery which took place seven years ago yesterday. She is allegedly connected
to the group of black and white revolutionaries convicted in the Brink’s heist.
A guard and two police officers were killed in that incident, which took place
upstate near Nyack.
In 1983, Obafemi was
busy trying to gain support in the black community for the people arrested in
the Brink’s case. In October of that year, several blacks and whites were
convicted in that robbery and in the highly planned breakout of Shakur from
prison in 1979.
The law enforcement
source implicating Sharpton in the hunt for Assata Shakur said that Sharpton
was also, secondarily, trying to help agents get other fugitives, especially
Mutulu Shakur, who was still on the run at that time. Mutulu Shakur, no
relation to Assata, was later apprehended and convicted in connection with the
Brink’s robbery and the escape of Assata Shakur.
( Mutulu Shakur )
prisonact-list@prisonactivist.org
( A project of the
Prison Activist Resource Center.)
SCRIPTURES
ZECHARIAH 11:4Thus saith
the LORD my God; Feed the flock of the slaughter; 5Whose possessors slay them,
and hold themselves not guilty: and they that sell them say, Blessed be the
LORD; for I am rich: and their own shepherds pity them not.
JUDE 1:11Woe unto them!
for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of
Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. 12These are spots in
your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without
fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit
withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; 13Raging waves
of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved
the blackness of darkness for ever.
EZEKIEL 34:1And the word
of the LORD came unto me, saying, 2Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds
of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD unto the
shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should
not the shepherds feed the flocks? 3Ye eat the fat, and ye clothe you with the
wool, ye kill them that are fed: but ye feed not the flock. 4The diseased have
ye not strengthened, neither have ye healed that which was sick, neither have
ye bound up that which was broken, neither have ye brought again that which was
driven away, neither have ye sought that which was lost; but with force and
with cruelty have ye ruled them. 5And they were scattered, because there is no
shepherd: and they became meat to all the beasts of the field, when they were
scattered. 6My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high
hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did
search or seek after them.
7Therefore, ye
shepherds, hear the word of the LORD; 8As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely
because my flock became a prey, and my flock became meat to every beast of the
field, because there was no shepherd, neither did my shepherds search for my
flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock; 9Therefore, O ye
shepherds, hear the word of the LORD; 10Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am
against the shepherds; and I will require my flock at their hand, and cause
them to cease from feeding the flock; neither shall the shepherds feed
themselves any more; for I will deliver my flock from their mouth, that they
may not be meat for them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday
Teenagers, social media, and terrorism: a threat level hard to assess
Authorities are leaning
more toward zero tolerance of teenagers who fling around online threats about
acts of violence or terrorism. As a result, what might have once merited a slap
on the wrist may today result in criminal charges.
The case of teenager
Cameron Dambrosio might serve as an object lesson to young people everywhere
about minding what you say online unless you are prepared to be arrested for
terrorism.
The Methuen, Mass., high
school student was arrested last week after posting online videos that show him
rapping an original song that police say contained “disturbing verbiage” and
reportedly mentioned the White House and the Boston Marathon bombing. He is
charged with communicating terrorist threats, a state felony, and faces a
potential 20 years in prison. Bail is set at $1 million.
Whether the arrest
proves to be a victory in America's fight against domestic terrorism or whether
Cameron made an unfortunate artistic choice in the aftermath of the Boston
bombing will become clear as the wheels of justice advance.
What is apparent
now, however, is that law enforcement agencies are tightening their focus on
the social media behavior of US teenagers – not just because young people often
fit the profile of those who are vulnerable to radicalization, but also because
the public appears to be more accepting of monitoring and surveillance aimed at
preventing attacks, even at the risk of government overreach.
RECOMMENDED: Quiz: How
much do you know about terrorism?
“When I was young,
calling a bomb threat to your high school because you didn’t want to go to
school that day was treated with a slap on the wrist. Try that nowadays and
you’re going to prison, no question about it. They are taking it more seriously
now,” says Rob D'Ovidio, a criminal justice professor at Drexel University in
Philadelphia who specializes in high-tech crime.
Teenagers are generally
blissfully unaware that law enforcement agencies are creating cyber units to
track and investigate developing ways that criminals, or would-be criminals,
research, socialize, and plot nefarious actions, from child molestation to
domestic terrorism. The Boston Marathon bombing suspects, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and
Tamerlan Tsarnaev, fit this profile: Each maintained a YouTubepage and Twitter
feed that promoted the teachings of a radical Muslim cleric. alongside
innocuous postings about music and sports. For law enforcement officials,
filtering what does and does not constitute a threat is a delicate balancing
act that, since the April 15 bombing, may be tilting to the side of additional
caution over individuals' free speech.
“The danger of this in
light of the tragedy in Boston is that law enforcement is being so risk-averse
they are in danger of crossing that line and going after what courts would
ultimately deem as free speech,” Mr. D'Ovidio says.
Want your top political
issues explained? Get customized DC Decoder updates.
Three people were killed
and at least 260 injured in the two bomb blasts near the Boston Marathon finish
line on April 15. Since then, questions have been raised about how authorities
missed signals, especially after alerts from Russian intelligence, that one of
the bombing suspects had become radicalized.
Tamerlan Tsarnaev, killed after a
gunfight with police, had been under surveillance byRussia for six months when
he traveled there in 2011 and 2012, besides his activity on social media.
“The bottom line is that
the public wants to know, after the fact, why [an attack] was not stopped.…
Most Americans are prepared to maintain a sophisticated watch on this without
[government] overreach, but most Americans also feel if these things can be
stopped before they begin, they want to see that happen,” says Michael
Greenberger, a law professor at the University of Maryland Center for Health
and Homeland Security.
Some authorities say
that zooming in on unu
sual behavior online fits squarely with how police have
conducted random searches on the street.
“The greatest mystery in
life is the human mind. We don’t know what other people do until it becomes
known. Our job is to figure it out, but we need indicators to know something’s
not right,” says Sgt. Ed Mullins of the New York Police Department, who is also
president of the Sergeants Benevolent Association, the city’s second-largest
police union.
Using a zero tolerance
approach to track domestic terrorists online is the only reasonable way to
analyze online threats these days, especially after the Boston Marathon bombing
and news that the suspects had subsequently planned to target Times Square in
Manhattan, Mullins says. The way law enforcement agencies approach online
activity that appears sinister is this: “If you’re not a terrorist, if you’re
not a threat, prove it," he says.
“This is the price you
pay to live in free society right now. It’s just the way it is,” Mullins adds.
That method can result
in arrests of teenagers whose online activity may be more aptly characterized
as stupid pranks.
In February, Jessica Winslow
and Ti'jeanae Harris, two high school girls in Rapids Parish, La., were
arrested and charged with 10 counts of terrorism each after they allegedly
e-mailed threats to students and faculty “to see if they could get away with
it,” detectives told a local television news station. “We take every threat in
our schools as a credible threat, and I am happy to say we have made these
arrests,” Sheriff William Earl Hilton told reporters.
( Ti'jeanae Harris )
(Jessica Winslow)
In January, Alex David
Rosario, a high school student in Armada Village, Mich., was charged with
domestic terrorism after he allegedly threatened to shoot fellow employees at
the Subway shop where he worked. He told police it was a joke. “We feel
threatening to kill somebody is not a joke. It doesn’t appear the prosecutor
takes it as a joke either and the judge certainly doesn’t,” said Armada Police
Chief Howard Smith.
( Alex David
Rosario )
Then there is the case
of Abdella Ahmad Tounisi, a Chicago-area teenager arrested last year after
trying to join, over the Internet, a Syrian militant group linked to Al Qaeda.
Last week, a federal judge allowed Mr. Tounisi home confinement while awaiting
trial.
(Abdella Ahmad Tounisi)
Militant and hate groups
are known to use the Internet to lure teenagers “to gain their sympathy”
through video games, music, or rhetoric that plays to themes of alienation,
D'Ovidio says. Connecting with terrorists would have been impossible in the
past, but today, as is alleged in the Tounisi case, anyone with a grudge or
curiosity, or both, and an Internet connection can open that dialogue.
Foolishly, the teens perceive that they are operating anonymously and within a
safe environment, D'Ovidio says.
“We know these groups
are catering and looking for these individuals," he says. "They
create the right environment for experimentation for kids who may have a
proclivity of being disgruntled toward the US government.”
Easy access to online
media, plus the urge to rebel, is a combustible mix that should make parents
vigilant, cautions Stephen Balkam, chief executive officer of the Family Online
Safety Institute, a nonprofit advocacy group in Washington that wants teenagers
to be better informed about the outcomes of what they post, tweet, or upload
online.
“Every generation of
teenagers has figured out a way of rebelling against their parents, or giving
it back to ‘the man.’ What I think is unprecedented is the very ‘man’ and the
system they want to rebel against can track them and find their digital
footprints online,” Mr. Balkam says. “In a sense, it’s good that we can catch
kids who are getting radicalized sooner than later, but by the same token, it’s
a challenge for kids to grow and develop, which is their job as a teenager, if
they are being scrutinized too much.”
SCRIPTURES
JOB 18:5Yea, the light
of the wicked shall be put out, and the spark of his fire shall not shine.
6The light shall be dark
in his tabernacle, and his candle shall be put out with him.
7The steps of his
strength shall be straitened, and his own counsel shall cast him down.
8For he is cast into a
net by his own feet, and he walketh upon a snare.
9The gin shall take him
by the heel, and the robber shall prevail against him.
10The snare is laid for
him in the ground, and a trap for him in the way.
11Terrors shall make him
afraid on every side, and shall drive him to his feet.
12His strength shall be
hungerbitten, and destruction shall be ready at his side.
13It shall devour the
strength of his skin: even the firstborn of death shall devour his strength.
14His confidence shall
be rooted out of his tabernacle, and it shall bring him to the king of terrors.
15It shall dwell in his
tabernacle, because it is none of his: brimstone shall be scattered upon his
habitation.
16His roots shall be
dried up beneath, and above shall his branch be cut off.
17His remembrance shall
perish from the earth, and he shall have no name in the street.
18He shall be driven
from light into darkness, and chased out of the world.
---------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)